The rest of it His basic thesis is globalization in reducing individuals into consumers in order its sole goal for profits undermines liberal democracy both at home and abroad by selling people what is possible instead of actively engaging people in shaping their own society, democratic civic virtue. Feb 03, Ilana rated it liked it. McWorld is the term that distinguished writer and political scientist Benjamin R. Basically, by giving this people a democracy and a middle class existence will you give them a stake at living life. Read it Forward Read it first.
But he highlights an interesting point, that most of the oil reserves are in countries that may become politically unstable due to either ethnic divisions in that country or autocratic nature of that country that are at odds with democratic aspirations of their people. The information-technology of globalization has opened up communications to people all over the world, allowing us to exchange information. Nevertheless, the citations are excellent and provided f There’s probably a reason why one should read “current affairs” books when they are current. McWorld Cover to the paperback edition. His cases are drawn largely from inside the West.
Jihad vs. McWorld by Benjamin R. Barber
A low-ish score for this uneven, hyperbolic, and vague book that nevertheless has a very compelling central claim. This is a mcworle engaging bs of the conflict between ethnic tribal nationalism and globalization.
Essentially, my main problem with this book is that it is childish and the writing style is the type that you would expect from a college freshman who deserved a C- on their final exam. I can’t say that Barber has a very clear idea of how to do this other than the creation of a global civil society.
Of course as industries mature, we will get foreign competition from abroad so the best course of action is to let economics play out and just create new global industries into which we dominate.
Read it Forward Read it first. Sep 26, Andrew rated it it was ok. Although capitalism could have only grown to current levels in the soil of democracies, Benjamin Barber argues that global capitalism now tends to work against the very concept of citizenship, of people thinking for themselves and with their neighbors. In chapter 3, he states that most countries manufactures for other countries instead of their own countries and he tries to shock us into thinking that is a bad thing because it makes us more dependent for other countries.
Barber is anxious to make sure we understand that by “jihad” he means blinkered, intolerant and essentially tribal fundamentalism, which has nothing to do with mainstream Islam. There is value in this book, but it is not necessarily found in the disappointingly s Provocative, but not incendiary.
Now can they successfully transition from an autocratic capitalist rule to a more liberal democratic rule is the biggest question? He does a great job describing the fundamental forces driving so much of the conflict we see in the world today and, unlike most of the articles you’ll read, actually attempts to describe how we can come to resolution.
Because of the profits he thought he could achieve by shocking you.
Thessis is the term that distinguished writer and political scientist Benjamin R. Barber complains that America is more and more dependent on other countries. I do not think it is a coincidence that the rise of Christian right as a strong political movement in the US during W years mirrors that Islamic fundamentalism in the middle east following the unfettered rule of secular globalization that characterized the Clinton years.
I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in American foreign policy and the challenges we face moving forward, especially as our society moves more and more toward corporatism.
Barber makes some very valid assertions yet fails to effectively argue for his thesis which we are left to bs ourselves as he doesn’t detail it too clearly. There is a lot to think about in here, and it has certainly sparked some other ideas and curiosities for me. While an autocratic regime can slow the “shock value” of immediate capitalist market, the reform of the market into capitalist structure gradually undermines the autocratic regime.
Review: Jihad vs McWorld by Benjamin R Barber | Books | The Guardian
Barber argues that democracy on the global level is jeopardized by both McWorld and jihad. What a phenomenal book, takes on the unforeseen results of globalization that have brought about such significant change in the world for the past 20 years and while it was written in va, turns out to be spot on for the current foreign policy moves our country has made recently.
The key point seems to be that the relationship between the two is one of mutual dependence as much as, or probably more than, jihac commonly accepted mutual destruction.
He further posits that McWorld could ultimately win the “struggle”. Barber states that even though the US is losing the deficit war in terms of manufacturing jobs, and possibly soft ware jobs, we are winning the war in terms of new service jobs of the 21st century because like always we create an industry out of thin air and run with it.
Nevertheless, the citations are excellent and provided f There’s probably a reason why one should read “current affairs” books when they are current.
It’s not ridiculous or dumb that they now have to add new words into their vocabulary to describe modern inventions, or that they would still want to distance themselves from the modern, white, countries they were forced into the margins of. This brings up an interesting point, if multi-national firms even ones that originate from the US have completely decoupled itself from national loyalty, then why is the US still subsidizing some of these companies as well as giving people who have capital, capital-gains tax breaks that may benefit the multi-national bottom-line but do not necessarily benefit the US economy while at the same time taking money from American coffers in a time of increasing deficits?
In chapter 14 he incessantly talks about various countries jigad their past conflicts v introducing his readers to even the slightest The ideas discussed within this book are extremely interesting, however at times they are terribly dated or geared at a thexis specific group of international theorists.
When Barber wrote this book, he identified nationalism as a greater threat to democracy than religious fundamentalism – a view that seems so shockingly out-of-touch today.
In the years since the book’s initial publication, I think it’s become increasingly clear that McWorld’s mindset has replaced a democractic mindset in the U. Benjamin Barber similarly questions the impact of economic globalization as well as its problems for democracy. People resist, again, both as groups and as individuals, or, often out of fear, Barber’s analysis of the mcworl world situation seems sad but basically true.
Jihad vs. McWorld
McWorld ostensibly just doesn’t care about democracy, seeking to subvert it with cash donations, lobbying, and multinational avoidance of national claims to tax revenue and regulation. He presents a convincing argument that these forces are powerful and in conflict with each other, and moreover, that both forces are profoundly anti-democratic in their effects.
And there is much to cheer in Barber’s analysis.